Mind Power News
Issue No. 150 / Friday, December 1, 2006
Edited by Andreas Ohrt /
www.MindPowerNews.com


In this issue:

IS 'REALITY' MERELY A MOVIE INSIDE YOUR HEAD?
Is consciousness a seamless experience or a string of fleeting images, like frames of a movie? The emerging answer will determine whether the way we perceive the world is illusory.

DOES THE BRAIN TAP INTO THE FUTURE? A third solution, one that seems ludicrous at first glance, is that the slow sensory information is referred backwards in time from the near future to match the fast information. Impossible, right?

SCIENTISTS TACKLE THE SECRETS OF TIME TRAVEL: "If you have curved space time, the time circles and you might just travel in time... If we can slow down the atom and isolate it and guide into the fluctuation then there's a possibility it's there."

'THE GOD THEORY' VIDEO: Is it possible for there to be a purpose in a Universe born in a Big Bang and filled with evolving life? Can the multiverse and superstring theories of cosmology be rendered consistent with an infinite intelligence? Might our human consciousness transcend physical matter?

HOW TO TALK TO YOUR FUTURE SELF: Here's how to get in touch with every talent, every ability you ever wanted for yourself, even if you're convinced you don't have a shred of ability in that area.

TIME AND PSYCHOKINESIS: Time does not exist. Not in the way we normally think at least... If we can learn to understand the nature of time in regards to our psychic efforts we will have much greater success with them.



Is "Reality" Merely a Movie Inside Your Head?

Is consciousness a seamless experience or a string of fleeting images, like frames of a movie? The emerging answer will determine whether the way we perceive the world is illusory

By Christof Koch
Source:
Scientific American

The brain is an amazingly dynamic organ. Millions of neurons in all corners of our gray matter send out an endless stream of signals. Many of the neurons appear to fire spontaneously, without any recognizable triggers. With the help of techniques such as electroencephalography (EEG) and microelectrode recordings, brain researchers are listening in on the polyphonic concert in our heads. Any mental activity is accompanied by a ceaseless crescendo and diminuendo of background processing. The underlying principle behind this seeming racket is not understood. Nevertheless, as everyone knows, the chaos creates our own unique, continuous stream of consciousness.

And yet it is very difficult to focus our attention on a single object for any extended period. Our awareness jumps constantly from one input to another. No sooner have I written this sentence than my eyes move from the computer screen to the trees outside my window. I can hear a dog barking in the distance. Then I remember the deadline for this article--which isn't going to be extended again. Resolutely, I force myself to type the next line.

How does this stream of impressions come to be? Is our perception really as continuous as it seems, or is it divided into discrete time parcels, similar to frames in a movie? These questions are among the most interesting being investigated by psychologists and neuroscientists. The answers will satisfy more than our curiosity--they will tell us if our experience of reality is accurate or a fiction and if my fiction is different from yours.

Nothing that we perceive, think or feel falls out of the blue into our inner eye. Each mental feat is grounded in particular processes in the brain. Scientific research methods are not well suited to studying the neuronal processes that accompany our conscious experience. Yet much has been learned concerning the neural basis of subjective experience. My old friend and colleague, the late Francis Crick, and I coined a term for these fascinating processes: neuronal correlates of consciousness, or NCCs--the set of firings among neurons that correlates with each bit of awareness that we experience.

How are we to understand the creation and disappearance of such NCCs? Do they spring--like Athena from the head of Zeus--completely formed from unconscious brain activity, only to dissolve instantly again? Such an all-or-nothing principle would certainly conform to our subjective experience, in which a thought or sensation is suddenly there and then disappears. On the other hand, NCCs might build up over a longer time until they intrude into our awareness and may then only slowly fade until they are so slight that we can no longer perceive them.

Something like this second theory is advanced by psychologist Talis Bachmann of the University of Tartu in Estonia. Bachmann believes that consciousness for any one sensation takes time, comparable to the development of a photograph. Any conscious percept--say, the color red--does not instantly appear; we become aware of it gradually. A large body of experimental work seems to support this hypothesis.

Measuring reaction times is the most obvious approach to studying the temporal structure of consciousness. As early as the 19th century, psychologists exposed test subjects to flashes of light that varied in duration and intensity. They were attempting to discover how long an individual had to be exposed to a stimulus to perceive it consciously and how close in time two stimuli had to be to be perceived as one continuous sensation.

Today researchers flash a small black bar on a computer screen and ask subjects to press a button as soon as they recognize whether the bar is vertical or horizontal. Measured this way, however, the reaction time includes not only the interval it takes for the eye and brain to process the stimulus but also how long it takes for the desired motor response--pressing the button.

READ THE FULL STORY HERE...
http://www.mindpowernews.com/MovieInYourHead.htm


Does the Brain Tap Into the Future?

By George Dvorsky
Source: Sentient Developments

While researching my protopanpsychism article, I came across the work of Dean Radin and Dick Bierman whose research has yielded some very eerie results.

Before I get to this, however, I’d like you to conduct a short experiment. While looking at your feet, stomp on the ground. You will notice that your visual perception of your foot hitting the floor matches your sensation of touching it. This would be fine except for one thing: the speed of light is vastly faster than the conduction times and synaptic delays through the long nerves and spinal cord from your feet. As a result, you should be seeing the event before you feel it – and the delay should be noticeable.

But it’s not.

Benjamin Libet and his associates first documented this phenomenon in 1979, which is now referred to as the ‘delay-and-antedating hypothesis/paradox.’ A number of explanations have been posited to reconcile this strange observation.

Perhaps there is a lag in the visual information. If this is the case, then the visual cortex is set for a time delay such that it can keep up with the slow pulses from the extremities. This would be a rather bizarre revelation if true, meaning that we are constantly viewing the world with a small degree of latency. This is almost certainly not the case, as Darwinian selection would favour those animals that do not experience any kind of visual delay. Living in the past would be grossly disadvantageous out in the wild.

Another possible solution is that sight and feel are experienced at separate times, but are remembered as happening simultaneously. Problems with this hypothesis are similar to the previous one – a suggestion that we are not meaningfully rooted in the present and that our brain “edits” reality for us.

A third solution, one that seems ludicrous at first glance, is that the slow sensory information is referred backwards in time from the near future to match the fast information.

Impossible, right?

Well, that’s where the work of Radin and Bierman come in. They have performed experiments in which it appears that the brain is reacting to stimuli before it is experienced. Radin and Bierman have conducted experiments in which subjects viewed random images flashing on a computer screen. Some of the images were rather neutral while others were meant to invoke a highly emotional response. The researchers discovered that the subjects responded strongly to the emotional images compared to the neutral ones, and that the response occurred between a fraction of a second to several seconds before the images appeared.

Bierman recently repeated these experiments using an fMRI brain scanner and documented emotional responses in brain activity up to 4 seconds before the stimuli. Other laboratories have made similar findings.

Assuming the data is being recorded and interpreted correctly, what's going on here? How is it possible that information can run backwards in time? Roger Penrose believes that quantum effects in the brain could explain backwards referral. He suggests that such effects may occur commonly and even routinely. “If in some manifestation of consciousness,” says Penrose, “classical reasoning about the temporal ordering of events leads us to a contradictory conclusion, then this is strong indication that quantum actions are indeed at work!" Neuroscientist Fred Alan Wolf has come to a similar conclusion and has offered his ‘Two-Time Observable Transactional Interpretation Model’ (TTOTIM) of consciousness.

Stuart Hameroff notes that quantum information can indeed run backwards, or be time indeterminate, citing the Aharonov formulation which suggests that each quantum state reduction has a dual vector, both forward and backwards in time.

What does this all mean? As Wolf notes, “we need to look toward altering our concept of time in some manner, not that this is an easy thing to do. Perhaps we should begin with the idea that a single event in time is really as meaningless as a single event in space or a single velocity. Meaningful relation arises as a correspondence, a relationship with some reference object.”

In addition, this not also adds further credence to the quantum consciousness hypothesis, but to panpsychist notions as well.



Scientists Tackle the Secrets of Time Travel

Source: BBC

Researchers are examining the fabric of space time and what science fiction authors refer to as the fourth dimension.

Dr Charles Wang will study the microscopic movement of atoms, which can be affected by the earth spinning. He said: "This is a very interesting possibility which cannot entirely be ruled out by physics."

Television's Dr Who and the Back to the Future movies promised the concept of time travel. Albert Einstein said instead of considering space to be a shapeless vacuum it should be looked at as an object.

The theory is for something to exist it must have length, breadth and thickness, the three dimensions.

It must also have something else. An object exists from the moment it is created to the moment it is destroyed. In between those moments is the duration of time - the so-called fourth dimension.

Space mission

HG Wells wrote the Time Machine about it - now Dr Wang hopes to make it real. He is a reader in the College of Physical Sciences and a member of the Aberdeen centre for applied dynamics research.

Dr Wang said he is waiting for the European Space Agency (ESA) to launch a science satellite to aid his research.

He told BBC Scotland: "If you have curved space time, the time circles and you might just travel in time... If we can slow down the atom and isolate it and guide into the fluctuation then there's a possibility it's there.

"The increased sensitivity obtained by a space experiment certainly makes a space mission very worthwhile... If successful the results will have a profound impact on our understanding of the fundamental nature of space and time in the universe."

Dr Wang however has time on his hands, as the ESA satellite is not due for launch until 2015.



The God Theory Video on YouTube

I found a very interesting 4-minute film based on the ideas proposed in Bernard Haisch's book The God Theory on YouTube...

Is it possible for there to be a purpose in a Universe born in a Big Bang and filled with evolving life? Can the multiverse and superstring theories of cosmology be rendered consistent with an infinite intelligence? Might our human consciousness transcend physical matter? Is our existence and the life we live the means whereby God experiences God's own potential?

WATCH THE VIDEO HERE...
http://www.mindpowernews.com/GodTheory.htm



"The Secret" is Out

By now you have probably heard about "The Secret," the phenomenal film that's already changing millions of lives around the world. Members of The Spiritual Cinema Circle's DVD club will receive "The Secret" in the month of December along with three great short films. For a limited time, as a special offer for the month of December, new subscribers to The Circle can receive a free trial membership (they pay only forshipping).



How to Talk to Your Future Self

By Charles Burke
Command More Luck

Here's how to get in touch with every talent, every ability you ever wanted for yourself, even if you're convinced you don't have a shred of ability in that area.

Physicists and mystics agree that all of time co-exists simultaneously. The way we experience time, with one moment following another moment after another moment, is (they say) an illusion. In reality, all moments of time are hanging around together, and our consciousness is threading its way through and among those moments of time.

(Just stay with me for a bit longer, and we'll be past all this theoretical stuff.)

They also say that there are an infinite number of variations of each possible moment. That's what they call "parallel universes" in the science fiction movies.

As it turns out, those parallel universes are not actually science fiction after all. They're really there-the physicists say so. We just can't usually see them.

But there is one way to perceive them. It's your intuition (or imagination).

You can actually tune your mind in to a talent you don't have, but would love to, and you can attract it to you. There is "another you" in that alternate "now" that has all the talent you wanted but didn't get.

So how do you benefit from this "other you"? How do you siphon off the abilities from the "talent gas-tank" of that other you, and get it into your mind?

The short answer is, you don't.

You don't try to take anything away from anybody. Instead, you reach out with your intuition and imagination and offer to combine your talents with those of that other you. You suggest a win-win merger that benefits you both.

Then you start training those new talents, and-surprise-those very talents appear from out of "nowhere" (but you'll know where).

Do this...

It's simple to do a bit of "day-dreaming" and talk to other versions of yourself. How do you reach them? Just imagine it. You're always talking to that policeman or judge or parent in your head. So why not your other selves in other possible universes? Just imagine them. Talk to them. Offer to do a joint venture-share some of what you know for some of what they can do.

And then, once you've made an agreement, just accept what comes. And enjoy it.

Charles Burke is the author of "Command More Luck," a book offering powerful suggestions for getting more cooperation from life, luck, and your own mind. Whether you call it synchronicity, serendipity, or just plain old luck, you CAN become more "naturally lucky." Learn more at Command More Luck

 


Time and Psychokinesis

By Dale Power
Source: Healing.WorldISPNetwork.com

Time does not exist. Not in the way we normally think at least. It certainly does not seem to work normally in psychic pursuits at any rate! This creates both problems and opportunities for us. If we can learn to understand the nature of time in regards to our psychic efforts we will have much greater success with them.

Due to the brief nature of this article, the subject will be confined to the issue of psychokinesis and time. While many of the same basic rules will apply to our information gathering skills, such as telepathy, precognition and remote viewing, because of our personal perspective, it is easier in some ways to understand what is going on with time when we try to effect change on the world around us.

Our problems with time, in regards to PK stem from two basic points;

1. Time does not exist, at least not in the way we are used to dealing with it, on a psychic level. This may indicate that psychic effects are taking place at a quantum level.

2. The portion of our minds that controls psychic functioning does not have a concept of time. That exists in a different area of the brain. So our psychic efforts must be linked to events rather than time coordinates.

Between these two points and our common perception of time, we run into a few problems. By noting the problems we can come up with some solutions that can increase our psychokinetic success rate.

PK spreads out over time. When you try to effect anything on a psychic level, the actual effect can be (if a researcher is careful and looks at the data) charted as starting before you begin the attempt, rise to a peak of strength a short while after the attempt takes place and then tapering off over time. Because time does not work in the same way on a psychic level, you can effect things before during and after the actual cause (your PK attempt) happens. Because your mind does not understand time in the portions of the brain that controls psychic functioning, its targeting of a specific event tends towards a more shotgun pattern.

It can take some thought to really understand how to deal with this problem. Time is so integral to how most of us think, that it seems almost silly that we would have to account for drift and PK effects going to the wrong time.

Another big problem is mis-targeting. It is very possible to be 100% successful in your psychic attempt, with the exception of the fact that you influenced an event that happened long ago, or will happen in the far future! It is possible in fact that every PK attempt has real world manifestations, but we are not local to the specific happening, so we never see the results.

To correct for this we will have to make sure that we:

Target specific events and give them unique patterns that our sub-conscious minds can identify easily. Gaining a good feel for the specific target before you begin. Make sure that you identify it as a unique and special happening before you begin. Also ensure you are in a deep conceptual state without too much linking to similar patterns. This will help keep you on target.

Also…

Pick targets that have stability once you have influenced them. Biological processes are a good example. Once you have healed a living thing, or made any change to its system, it tends to continue to reflect the change for a while. Things like the weather, the state of an object or the location of an object are good examples as well. You get more out of each attempt, as it can make changes over time, and not lose most of your effort. All of these things will tend to hold on to the changes made rather than immediately shifting back to their previous state.

Use all of your psychic abilities. If you can locate the specific “now” of the event that you wish to influence on a psychic level, it is fairly simple to “lock” into it, making sure that you are not just throwing psychic power at any similar event that has ever happened. So it is useful to not divorce your psychokinetic techniques from your information gathering talents. Feedback is essential for improvement over time.

We live with a specific relationship to time. While we are not going to increase raw power by improving our targeting in regards to time, we can greatly increase the level of effect, by controlling the “when” of things as well as the “what”.

Also by Dale Power: How to Bend Time



More news at the Mind Power Blog
  • 7 Keys for Manifesting Your Deepest Desires
  • The High Price of Financial Freedom
  • Up to 96% Claim Paranormal Experience
  • Subliminal Erotic Images Affect the Brain
  • The Power of Your Mind in the Fight Against Aging

Read them all here: www.mindpowernews.com/Blog



Want more fascinating news?
Daily headlines are now available at the Mind Power Blog. Simply sign up on the right-hand side of the page and receive all the best new headlines as soon as I find them.

Want to Subscribe/Unsubscribe?
To unsubscribe, simply follow the link at the very bottom of this message. If somebody forwarded this message to you, please sign up to receive your own copy of this e-zine each week at www.mindpowernews.com